| » Forum Index » Readers' gallery » Topic: out in the field |
|
Posted on 06/02/12 5:02:43 PM |
|
marlcliff
Knight of Intrigue Posts: 171 Reply  |
out in the field
 |
Posted on 07/02/12 07:27:16 AM |
|
Steve Caplin
Administrator Posts: 6987 Reply  |
Re: out in the field
I like the idea of this one, Phill, but if you're going to include such a huge visible light source as the moon then you really need to make sure it actually is the light source! The girl is lit from somewhere over to the left... and there shouldn't be any blue left in the sky with a moon like that. I'm also a little concerned that your moon appears to be in front of some of the clouds. Either use a less cloudy sky, or hide the moon more. |
Posted on 07/02/12 4:40:42 PM |
|
marlcliff
Knight of Intrigue Posts: 171 Reply |
Re: out in the field
Thank you Steve for the helpful comments, yeah the moon was a little low in the sky that night heh. now you pointed the problems i can see them. I can't move the girl thats all i have of her. should i try and recolour the left light or move the moon? Cheers Phill |
Posted on 08/02/12 07:39:21 AM |
|
Steve Caplin
Administrator Posts: 6987 Reply |
Re: out in the field
Maybe have a lot more of her in shadow? Although actually, the image would probably be stronger without the moon in it. By the way, a rectangular patch of sky has become desaturated. Is there an Adjustment Layer somewhere with a mask that needs adjusting? |
Posted on 15/02/12 1:07:14 PM |
|
marlcliff
Knight of Intrigue Posts: 171 Reply |
Re: out in the field
does look better without moon. I made the night sky black. 
"patch of sky has become desaturated. Is there an Adjustment Layer somewhere with a mask that needs adjusting" i went thru each layer couldnt find this  weird.
|