| » Forum Index » How to Cheat in Photoshop CC » Topic: movie version? |
|
Posted on 27/02/05 09:36:53 AM |
|
Devilslayer
* Posts: 15 Reply |
Re: movie version?
Steve what do you use to create movies? Is it Techsmiths Camtasia? www.techsmith.com It seems fairly easy to produce a movie using this. |
Posted on 27/02/05 9:45:32 PM |
|
Steve Caplin
Administrator Posts: 6835 Reply  |
Re: movie version?
I use Snapz Pro, which is a Mac program. It's the voiceovers that really take the time, and I'm not sure why they take so long to do. Thought of doing it with captions instead this time around, if that doesn't amek it too impersonal. |
Posted on 02/03/05 1:30:07 PM |
|
eventer
*** Posts: 165 Reply  |
Re: movie version?
I would like to add my vote for lots of movies. I loved them. I would definitely buy a full dvd if you brought one out. |
Posted on 02/03/05 4:22:17 PM |
|
NW Rain
* Posts: 37 Reply |
Re: movie version?
I enjoy hearing the voice and would prefer it to captions. I think people tend to be too net when adding captions. Then the learning style is too close to reading the book, whereas a voice on a movie reaches the hearing learning style. By reading the book, seeing and hearing the instructions, one has covered all the learning sytles and will most likely "get it". I enjoy reading the book, but find the actual doing of the workthrough helps to cement the idea better than just reading. Being able to view the movie, in addition to reading and finishing the workthrough, is the best of all worlds. I agree that the movies really are a wonderful addition to the book and would encourage you to add as many as you can. I can see where it would take much more time and effort to add movies for each section, which might cause the price of the book to sky rocket. Perhaps a DVD that could become an add-on product might be a consideration. Then those of us who learn better through the addition of sight and sound could make the decision to spend more money. |
Posted on 03/03/05 4:37:17 PM |
|
Steve Caplin
Administrator Posts: 6835 Reply |
Re: movie version?
OK, maybe you're right, I'll try to keep the voiceover. I just realised after recording them that each one started "we're going to…" which sounded a bit stupid, to me. And, yes, I'll do as many as I have time and disk space for! Glad you find them useful. Worth the pain, after all! |
Posted on 03/03/05 5:36:08 PM |
|
maiden
Golden Gif Gagster Posts: 471 Reply  |
Re: movie version?
I don't know why your so bashful about your voice Steve it sounds perfectly okay on the existing movies - Succinct and clearly understandable. My pet hate is viewing Tutorial Movies with lots of Errs and Ums as if they haven't thought out what they were presenting yours by contrast is clear & concise and no faffing about. So let's have no more of this nonsense about your voice, Steve - Say it loud & proud 
_________________ mad as a badger and twice as furry |
Posted on 03/03/05 7:05:13 PM |
|
julie
* Posts: 35 Reply |
Re: movie version?
I too really like the movies and there's absolutely nothing wrong with your narration, Steve. |
Posted on 03/03/05 7:09:00 PM |
|
trinityofone
Guest Reply |
Re: movie version?
I agree totally (but also sympathise with Steve about the time involved), the voiceovers are fine, by no means dull or droning - some others I've heard have left me drawing a noose with the pen-tool, rather than the task at hand  _________________ A happy-go-lucky chap, always dressed in black |
Posted on 22/04/05 8:18:35 PM |
|
Atomicfog
Virtual Visualizer Posts: 238 Reply  |
Re: movie version?
There are voice masking programs out there... You could make yourself sound like anyone with those. _________________ -Atomic |
| page: 1 2 last |